unpublished [verb] (origin: Boing Boing) 1. To delete, destroy, or otherwise remove the work of an individual from existence as if the work in question had never been there in the first place, as long as you created it, it was something you did personally, and it can be viewed elsewhere. Example: Andrea Yates unpublished her children; you can still see photos of them in albums and home movies. 2. To take away an individual’s ability to view a work. Example: FOX unpublished episodes of The Simpsons from my TIVO after a week through DRM.
Lexicon Entry: Unpublished
By The Wife | July 6th, 2008 — Uncategorized
The State of the InterTubes
By The Wife | July 3rd, 2008 — It Came from the InterTubes, On the InterTubes:, a process of dumbening, boingboing sucks, opinion
A (not so) final word on BoingBoing jumping the shark into hypocrisy and The Communist’s Consumerist creates new “commenting rules” so ridiculous and censorial that I gave up reading it. Continue reading →
BoingBoing vs. Violet Blue: It’s Go Time
By The Wife | July 2nd, 2008 — Personal, Techie, Uncategorized, boingboing sucks, life lessons, politik
So, if you’re a fan of Teh Intertubes, you know all about the non-smackdown that happened between Violet Blue and BoingBoing and just how boring and frustrating it’s been the past few days. When will someone at BoingBoing say something that doesn’t sound like Scott McClellan wrote it? When will the BB fan boys stop acting like Violet Blue is the devil? When will readers notice that BoingBoing and Big Brother share initials and memory hole policies?
For those of you who aren’t Intertubes fans or have been in a cave recently, the non-story of the year goes like this:
Violet Blue is a sex blogger and sometimes writer/radio show host who probably has more money than God that comes from simply talking about sex. Boing Boing is an anti-censorship, liberal vehicle for Cory Doctorow’s latest work copyleft/copyfight blog that pretty much makes money from talking about how much copyright, big government, and invasion of privacy suck. Sometimes, the libertarians on this blog are all over BoingBoing; sometimes, we’re just over it.
The connection between the two comes from the fact that Blue once wrote a few posts for BoingBoing, and used to be a favorite on BoingBoing insomuch as she was linked to with frequency. Over the course of a few years, Blue wrote for or was mentioned in BoingBoing somewhere on the order of 70 times, give or take a few, according to an LA Times blogger who bothered to go to the WayBack Machine and count.
Why the Wayback Machine? Well, that’s the rub. You see, according to BoingBoing, they “unpublished”, which is a NewSpeak way of saying “deleted”, not just articles by Ms. Blue, but every mention of her in existence on their site, effectively scrubbing her from their archives and sending her down the memory hole.
Trust us, Winston Smith was doubleplusbusy that day.
Naturally, for such an anti-censorship site as BoingBoing, this seems rather odd, especially since there was no transparency in the action to unpublish Ms. Blue: one day she existed in the BB universe, the next she did not. Even Ms. Blue was unaware of her deletion until this past week, when the news slowly began to trickle out that she was gone from BB. People began to ask questions, and alternatively flame the hell out of BoingBoing, and BB began a hard and fast policy of denial: any comment that mentioned Violet Blue was systematically deleted from their site. The InterTubes grew restless. Metafilter got involved, then ValleyWag picked up the story, which then hit its sibling site Gawker, and all hell broke loose.
Sometime yesterday, BoingBoing responded to the controversy with a non-post about the issue by Moderator-cum-Douchebag Teresa Nielson-Hayden, who did her best White House Press Secretary working interview and forced out the editors’ response to the controversy, which was pretty much “This is a personal blog, we’ll damn well do what we feel like and have no responsibility to tell the readers what happened or why. More over, this is personal, so leave us alone.”
Also, she cannot comment on an ongoing investigation.
Now, that by itself wouldn’t be so bad, if the comments that followed weren’t routinely attacked for asking questions that seemed pretty self-evident after reading the post, such as how can a blog about transparency and accountability be neither transparent nor account for its actions? How can they continue to post about Mr. Doctorow’s novel fighting Big Brother (entitled “Little Brother”) when they had gone totally BB themselves and unpublished a writer? Between Nielson-Hayden and the readers, things in the comments quickly spiraled out of hand and two camps formed: fan boys who believe BB can do nothing wrong, reading for two minutes of hate with Violet Blue as a symbol of all that’s wrong with the InterTubes, and conspiracy theorists and general uber-left communists who now want BB staff to post home addresses, SSNs, and all other personal data to be the most transparent InterTubes blog of all times or else fail miserably under the weight of evil corporate oppression.
After that there were only three or four new posts to BoingBoing’s site, ending around 3PM. Then, for six hours, BoingBoing was dark, save for the glowing light of the comments thread growing exponentially. Meanwhile, ever the willing victim in all of this, Ms. Blue was giving interviews to any blogger who would listen. She even created a spreadsheet detailing every post involving her that was deleted from BB. When it comes to being sympathetic, Ms. Blue seemed to be aiming for a new residency over at Fail Blog.
Lost somewhere in the maelstrom was the question that the first few hundred posts reasonably asked: what transgression did Violet Blue commit that was so horrible and unspeakable, she had to be erased from the annals of BoingBoing, at the expense of BoingBoing’s own integrity?
For anything even close to an answer, only the LA Times and SF Gate came close to getting answers, and theirs had the ring of X-Files paranoia to them.
1: Cory Doctorow is a big copyleft protector, fighter of the “evil” of copyright. Violet Blue legally changed her name two years ago to Violet Blue and soon after sued a porn star for using Violet Blue as a name. Said porn star is a single mom (Oh noes! Leftists always bleed extra hard for the single mommies!) quit the business to sell her own work herself (Leftists also get massive hard-ons for independent production and small business) and (here’s the actually important part) had been using the name since 1999, long before Ms. Blue was a sex blogger. Moreover, it is believed that Violet Blue knew of the porn star’s existence before legally changing her name, and allegedly, before even using the moniker at all. Blue (the sex blogger) even had Blue (the porn star mommy) on her radio show once. The fact that Blue (PSM) couldn’t afford a decent attorney and was trounced in court by Blue (SB) would have really pressed Doctorow’s buttons wrong and ended with Blue being throughly denounced on BoingBoing. However, Blue being a former contributor, it might have looked bad to other editors or the almighty sponsors if Blue was still on the site as a contributor and yet trashed later on, so it was best to delete her and go on their separate ways.
2. Federated Media supports BoingBoing through ad revenue almost exclusively. Like many other publications, BoingBoing could, theoretically, be held hostage to the demands of Federated Media, and if they decided association with Ms. Blue was becoming a liability, they could demand she be wiped from the site.
3. Blue was “riding the coattails” of her BoingBoing posts, according to some readers and bloggers familiar with the two. She allegedly referred to herself as the fifth BoingBoing editor, which may have bruised an ego or two, and eventually might have had a falling out over taking more credit than her due and trying to raise her importance level to back her new projects.
4. Editor Xeni Jardin and Ms. Blue were allegedly involved at some point, and the affair turned sour. A hurt Jardin may have then convinced the other three editors that deletion of Ms. Blue was the best way to go. This rumor is fueled by a LA Times blog post which suggests that after a conversation with both Jardin and Blue, the blogger was satisfied that it truly was a personal matter handled poorly and not worth the bru-ha-ha it generated. Of course, that blogger’s lips are sealed.
5. Combine theories three and four. Or, as ValleyWag puts it:
For Blue, we’ve come to believe, the friendship always had a mercenary angle — Jardin could get her linked as well as laid. The association with Boing Boing boosted Blue’s career. How painful it must have been for Jardin to realize she was being used by a groupie who wanted to join her band. And people in pain exercise supremely bad judgment, which is what Jardin did when she “unpublished” posts about Blue from Boing Boing.
None of the rumors implicate either Mark or David as the root of the problem, which makes sense, as Mark just seems like such a nice guy, you can’t imagine him getting into a fight with anyone (did you see him on the Colbert Report?) and David isn’t nearly as active as the other three. Mark and David are like the Ringo and George to Doctorow and Jardin’s Lennon and McCartney, respectively. While you can see the latter getting into public feuds with people, the former just are so freakin’ nice and quiet, you’d have to murder their ickle robot puppies for them to get upset with you, and even then you could probably settle the matter over a cup of tea or something.
So, no matter what theory you subscribe to, the one thing all the theories have in common is that BoingBoing has compromised their principles for some unnameable reason, which makes the compromising of said principles all the more suspect. For a group of editors who decry the Bush Administration (and who doesn’t anymore, really?) they sure have learned a few lessons from the last 8 years under Bush Jr’s reign, such as how to talk without actually saying anything.
War is Peace.
Secrecy is Transparency.
Long live BoingBoing.
FOX News has got to stop
By The Wife | June 27th, 2008 — Uncategorized
I always knew that FOX news was a bunch of racist, elitist, neo-con bastards, but to go this far is fucked up. From MoveOn.org:
FOX’s smears against Obama are out of control–have you heard about them? I just signed a petition telling FOX that their use of racism and prejudice is not okay. Would be great if you signed too.
First, a paid FOX commentator accidentally confused “Obama” with “Osama” and then joked on the air about killing Obama. Next, a FOX anchor said a playful fist pound by Barack and Michelle Obama could be a “terrorist fist jab.” (Seriously!) And then, FOX called Michelle Obama “Obama’s baby mama”–slang used to describe the unmarried mother of a man’s child.
Nearly 100,000 folks have signed a petition that will be delivered to FOX. Can you sign too? The more names, the bigger the impact. Here’s the link:http://pol.moveon.org/stopthesmears/?r_by=13009-8324528-tTuJeNx&rc=paste
A Quandry
By The Wife | May 26th, 2008 — politik
As many of you know, we here at BoMb have been supporting Mike Gravel’s candidacy since he was a Democrat. Ideologically, he lines up with everything we stand for:
Invisible Bike (LOLCat) Mural
By The Wife | May 24th, 2008 — It Came from the InterTubes
Over at Laughing Squid, there is a post about “the world’s largest LOLCat”: an artist painted a mural of the famous “Invisible Bike” LOLCat image on the side of a San Francisco building:
[Link]
Buy a Car, get a gun free
By The Wife | May 23rd, 2008 — Personal, Techie, Uncategorized, life lessons, politik
From BBC News:
Apparently, a creative-minded car salesman in Missouri had an idea on how to stop flagging car sales due to increased gas prices: buy a car, get a gun for free!
Lip Gloss for Shark Attack Victims
By The Wife | May 23rd, 2008 — O RLY?
Remember that young female surfer who lost a limb to a shark in 2003, the summer when America went shark-crazy due to an unusual number of attacks? Well, she’s back, with a lip gloss she designed that can be opened and applied with one hand.
Now 18, the Hawaii native has a line of lip products called Stoked that you can push up and down with just one arm.
They sell on Amazon for $4.50 and could probably be useful even if you’re not an invincible surf baby, but instead a really busy girl carrying coffee and keys in one hand, and a handbag and a cell phone in the other.
[Link]
RFID Tags in your Luggage Tag
By The Wife | May 23rd, 2008 — i for one welcome our new overlords
Apparently, Las Vegas’ Mcclarran International Airport has taken the next step in full on Big Brother-hood for the United States by putting RFID tags with all the of the traveler’s information into their luggage tags, so you can feel an extra slap in the face as you pay $15 for your first checked bag on American Airlines.
I was reading an article this morning on the new American Airlines luggage charge (THAT’s gonna go over well), and noticed an aside starting on page 3…Las Vegas is using RFIDs in outgoing luggage tags now to help move bags more efficiently.
Now, I’m not saying I’m even completely against this, used correctly…but I had no idea that it was occuring. THAT I don’t like…especially since I have a bag sitting in the hallway that just came back from Vegas! Checking…nope, no I’m an arphid note on it.
But oh yeah…it’s there.
Late Delivery
By The Wife | May 23rd, 2008 — O RLY?
According to the Hindustan Times, a woman recently “gave birth,” via surgical extraction, to a petrified fetus twenty-five years over due.
Rahatun Nessa, a mother of five children was admitted to the hospital on May 5 with complaints of a lump in her lower abdomen. A resident of Kalaigaon in Darrang district, she had this lump for the last 25 years. Dr Nikhil Rajkhowa, one of the four doctors who conducted the operation, said the embryo, formed about 25 years ago, got aborted to the peritoneal cavity from the mother’s uterus and grew like a full normal baby.


