Entries from April 2009 ↓

Thoughts on the subject of the “conscience” clause

Someone interested in pharmacology could go into research and work for Big Pharma instead of being a dispenser at the local Walgreens and refusing the morning after pill to a rape victim. But that would require more education, which is expensive.

Someone who enjoyed bringing babies into the world by attending births could be a midwife, a birthing coach, or a maternity nurse to avoid dealing with the termination of pregnancy. But that would greatly decrease his or her ability to bring in revenue for annual PAP smears, treating women with HRC, etc.

So, when those who’d opt out via the “conscience” clause say it’s about religion, what they’re really saying is that it’s about the money, honey.

Everything new is old again

Oh, fuck you, you Socialist prick.